July 18, 2026

Jon Buehler Defends Scott Peterson Conviction Amid New Evidence Claims

Retired Detective Backs Scott Peterson Conviction

On Fox & Friends, retired homicide detective Jon Buehler strongly defended the conviction of Scott Peterson for the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson. Buehler criticized recent documentary claims proposing alternate theories, such as Laci interrupting a burglary or sightings of her walking their dog after Peterson left. He challenged the validity of these new analyses, arguing they lack substantial proof.

Claims of New Evidence

Despite nearly 22 years since the conviction, Peterson’s legal team claims to have surfaced new evidence that could potentially overturn the conviction. The attorneys, in collaboration with the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP), shared findings in a two-part A&E docuseries titled “Scott Peterson: The New Evidence.” They argue these findings could critically impact the infamous conviction. Retired LAPD detective Ninette Toosbuy indicated that standard missing person protocols weren’t followed, fueling her belief that Peterson deserves a new trial. She stressed that a fair trial is a fundamental right in America.

Mother’s Firm Stance Against Claims

Sharon Rocha, Laci’s mother, stays resolute in her belief of Peterson’s guilt. Rejecting claims from the documentary, she maintains there is no new evidence to exonerate him. Prosecutors remain firm on their original narrative that Peterson murdered Laci, who was eight months pregnant, on Christmas Eve 2002, discarding her body in San Francisco Bay.

Conflicting Witness Accounts

The docuseries mentions 15 individuals who reportedly saw Laci walking her dog on the morning of December 24, contradicting Peterson’s account of leaving for a fishing trip. Chris Pixley, a defense attorney in the docuseries, argues that Modesto police dismissed these accounts and focused solely on Peterson. Pixley suggests these overlooked testimonies could have changed the trial’s outcome.

Burglar Theory Not Fully Investigated

Peterson’s defense argues that a burglary near the Peterson home on the morning of Laci’s disappearance wasn’t thoroughly investigated. A van found with possible bloodstains near the scene led them to theorize Laci interrupted a crime, resulting in her death. Toosbuy criticizes the authorities for not exploring this connection further. She calls for a complete investigation into any potential evidence found on the van’s mattress.

Debate Over Locations

The series also explores an LAIP expert’s use of Delft3D hydrodynamic modeling to challenge the claimed entry point of Laci’s body into the bay. The expert posits that the body could have been placed farther, questioning previous conclusions.

Ongoing Legal Struggles

Despite these claims, recent attempts to overturn the conviction have been denied. Stanislaus County District Attorney Jeff Laugero emphasizes the need for justice for Laci and Conner. Nonetheless, Peterson’s attorneys are determined to appeal to higher courts.

Entertainment Reporter Stephanie Nolasco continues to cover developments for Fox News Digital.

TAGS: