A survey conducted by the Skokie Park District shows a slim majority of residents would support a $53 million bond referendum for new park developments. This involves building a new park and enhancing an existing one. The vote, which took place on July 21, was unanimous among district officials to place the measure on the Nov. 3 ballot for public decision.

The proposed project aims to develop Channelside Park South on a former asphalt site on Oakton Street. Currently, the Skokie Park District features 45 active parks, with some being smaller neighborhood parks. If voters approve, funding will also improve Skokie Sports Park and Sports Park East. Planned upgrades include a recreation center with multi-sport courts, more walking and biking paths, and a bridge connecting Sports Park to the North Shore Channel Trail.

The Skokie Park District Board of Commissioners noted that 54% of survey respondents expressed a likelihood of supporting the referendum. In June, several public information sessions addressed how these projects would impact property tax bills. Homeowners with a property value of $500,000 would face an annual increase of about $183, while those owning a $1 million home would see an increase of $379.

Approximately 67,000 residents could be impacted by this measure, spanning nearly all of Skokie and parts of Evanston, Morton Grove, and Chicago. The Skokie Park District operates independently of the Village of Skokie, managing its budget and tax levies. A new Channelside Park South would feature amenities such as a multipurpose facility, band shell, outdoor fitness equipment, and a children’s splash pad.

Sports Park East, a popular recreation venue, would include a new recreation center, rental rooms, golf simulators, and expanded parking if funded. There are considerations for adding baseball fields, depending on community opinions. Work on these projects would likely start in spring 2027, with an 18 to 24-month timeline for completion.

The proposal arises from community feedback requesting more walking, biking paths, and sports facilities. Although Skokie already has a variety of recreation spaces, including playgrounds and sports fields, some residents express concerns about costs.

“Most voters do not fully understand how a bond referendum is paid for,” said resident Sheldon Wernikoff. He advocates for clearer ballot language to ensure voters understand the financial implications.

Wernikoff argues the focus should be on affordable housing, not additional parks. He suggests that land would better serve the community if used for housing projects, highlighting a lack of such options in Skokie.