Lawsuit Filed Against DOJ’s New Fund
Two police officers who were present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration. They aim to block the Department of Justice’s new “anti-weaponization fund,” which they claim will support groups like the Proud Boys. Officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges, who confronted rioters on that day, are suing President Donald Trump, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. They argue that the $1.776 billion fund threatens their safety.
“The Fund’s mere existence sends a clear and chilling message: those who enact violence in President Trump’s name will not just avoid punishment, they will be rewarded with riches,” the complaint reads.
The officers are seeking a court order to prevent the fund’s implementation and to recover any disbursed payments.
Response and Context
A Department of Justice spokesperson criticized past administrations for allegedly using federal resources against political opponents. They pledged to reveal such actions and rectify suffered injustices. Newsweek reached out to the White House and the Treasury for comments.
Details of the Complaint
According to the complaint, the fund is purportedly illegal, unconstitutional, and hazardous. Blanche stated that the fund is intended for those who believe they were unjustly prosecuted under the Biden administration’s DOJ. Dunn and Hodges contend that this will enable federal funding for groups threatening law enforcement, like the Proud Boys, who received pardons from Trump.
“The Anti-Weaponization Fund will both compensate and empower the very people making those threats. Militias like the Proud Boys will use money from the Fund to arm and equip themselves,” states the complaint.
The complaint further argues that the fund signals impunity for past and potential future acts of violence.
Structure and Oversight Concerns
The officers criticize the fund’s creation, highlighting issues with the five-member commission overseeing it. This commission, answerable to the president and attorney general, allegedly lacks statutory support and poses risks of abuse.
Purpose and Oversight of the Anti-Weaponization Fund
The Justice Department describes the fund as a mechanism for filing claims of improper targeting by the government, especially under the Biden administration. It allows for apologies and financial compensation, with planned audits and oversight by appointed officials.
During a Senate hearing, Blanche defended the fund against criticisms relating to the DOJ’s actions, including their handling of the Epstein files. Senator Chris Van Hollen questioned the eligibility criteria for fund applicants, specifically regarding January 6 participants. Blanche did not confirm disqualifications for those individuals.
Next Steps in the Legal Challenge
Dunn and Hodges seek a judicial declaration that the fund’s establishment is unlawful, aiming to halt its funding and operations.