Jodi Kantor, a reporter for the New York Times, discussed on CNN why Democrats are willing to support Maine senatorial candidate Graham Platner despite multiple allegations against him. Kantor, who won a Pulitzer Prize for exposing Harvey Weinstein’s abuses, explained the rationale behind supporting Platner, suggesting the accusations do not fit the classic MeToo mold.

Graham Platner has faced accusations from women who claim he abused them. One former girlfriend accused him of physical abuse and locking her in a room overnight. There are also allegations of inappropriate sexual communication and dismissing rape victims. These claims have not deterred supporters eager to gain political power.

Kantor stated that these are not typical MeToo allegations. She clarified, “They’re not about a boss and a young female employee being subjected to sexual advances. They were mostly made in the context of consensual relationships.” She added that the reports from former girlfriends were different from classic abuse allegations.

Such arguments might echo past controversies. During Brett Kavanaugh’s hearings, similar rationalizations faced intense scrutiny. Kantor argued that the allegations were more about seeing Platner’s character and finding it “scary” due to his behaviors and associations.

Critics have pointed out other controversies, including his alleged mocking of wounded veterans and rural communities, alongside praises for Hamas and communism. Despite these issues, Platner’s supporters, including prominent Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, have celebrated his nomination.

Even media figures, such as “The View” co-host Sunny Hostin, have offered rationalizations for supporting Platner. Hostin, emphasizing the importance of gaining political power, acknowledged Platner’s problematic characteristics but argued for strategic voting.

Ultimately, Kantor’s explanations reflect a willingness to support a candidate despite troubling accusations, driven by political motivations.