The U.S. Supreme Court concluded a contentious term in June amid escalating partisan tensions. Immediately after, Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan voiced concerns over judiciary security during congressional testimony post-recess.

Supreme Court justices are wary of how partisan narratives influence public views of their decisions, affecting not just their safety. Chief Justice John Roberts highlighted in his 2024 report that courts face challenges in countering misinformation as judges communicate primarily through decisions, not press conferences or rebuttals. Outside its rulings, the Supreme Court engages the public via live audio of oral arguments during its term from October to June, a feature introduced in 2020.

In 2022 and earlier this year, both C-SPAN and Pierrepont Consulting tracked voter sentiment concerning the Supreme Court’s favorability, awareness, interest, and live audio consumption. Findings indicate that awareness of live audio has increased from 46% in 2022 to 55% in 2026, driven by Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z. Boomers and voters over 80, comprising roughly one-third of likely voters, remain largely unaware, with recognition reaching only 39%, a slight increase from 37% in 2022. Conversely, 63% of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z voters are cognizant of live audio.

Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z are more inclined to receive Supreme Court updates from social media (75%), where oral argument audio is prevalent, as opposed to older media formats. In contrast, older voters still depend on traditional TV news sources. Among those exposed to live audio, Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z voters are more inclined to view the Supreme Court positively by a 58-18% margin. Only 27% of Boomers are affected similarly, often relying on traditional news channels, which include partisan commentary.

Live audio gradually builds trust, according to 2022 and 2026 findings, enhancing court perceptions primarily among younger generations accessing it through digital platforms. This is notable given digital media’s association with misinformation, often amplified by AI. However, digital media offers broader access to Supreme Court discussions, allowing the public more direct engagement with courtroom exchanges.

These insights highlight generational differences in media consumption and trust in live audio. Hearing justices directly shapes favorable views, aiding public understanding even amidst disagreements with court rulings. Live audio’s influence on court favorability indicates the potential value of introducing courtroom cameras. Televised arguments, akin to live audio, could demonstrate the seriousness of the justices’ work, expanding critical perspectives and countering misleading partisan narratives.

Robert Green and Ian Green are positioned at Pierrepont Consulting and Analytics.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.