Recently, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez expressed criticism towards past progressive stances such as ‘defund the police.’ Reflecting on the aftermath of the George Floyd incident and the COVID-19 pandemic, she acknowledged that some rhetoric was excessive.
In contrast to this distancing, academic institutions struggle with similar issues. The situation surrounding Cambridge University sociologist Jason Arday, who passed away amid allegations of plagiarism and fabrication, highlights systemic problems. These allegations against Arday emerged upon his arrival at Cambridge, but were largely ignored for some time. Some defenders dismissed the claims as racial attacks.
Assumptions that a university and broader society are inherently racist led to accusations being perceived through the lens of racial bias. However, without evidence, these assertions fall apart. Evidence should guide decisions, but racial identity often overshadows merit in academic judgments. This ‘Woke 101’ perspective prioritizes identity over qualifications, diminishing traditional standards.
Tyler Austin Harper’s experience at Bates College illustrates this. Initially supportive of affirmative action, Harper’s views shifted after witnessing search committees favoring identity over competence. He found it troubling that less-qualified candidates were hired based solely on race, undermining his own achievements.
Allegations of racial incidents can escalate without sufficient evidence. Harper’s colleague exaggerated a dispute involving a white student and his Black roommate as an attempted lynching. The situation was misunderstood, emphasizing the need for evidence in racism claims.
Claims by Arday, such as receiving threats, lacked verifiable evidence. Even so, Arday’s race seemed to shield him from scrunity. London Mayor Sadiq Khan called Arday’s death a prompt for self-reflection, but his career highlighted the leniency and protection he received due to racial assumptions.
These instances underscore the need for evidence-based assessments in universities. Accusations must not assume racial motives without proof. Addressing these issues is critical as political figures like Donald Trump view universities as sources of ideological indoctrination.
To counter criticism, academia must address its shortcomings, especially concerning race and merit. This is a necessary step for universities, in line with Ocasio-Cortez’s reflection on past errors.
Jonathan Zimmerman, a history and education professor at the University of Pennsylvania, explores these themes further in his upcoming book.