During a recent bilateral meeting, President Donald Trump described a new U.S.-Iran agreement as ‘a wall to a nuclear weapon’ and criticized it as ‘one of the dumbest deals.’ The agreement has sparked criticism from Trump’s supporters who argue it rewards Iran before it fully dismantles its nuclear program.
Fox News’ Harris Faulkner outlined key elements of the deal. These include a 60-day negotiation period for a final agreement, a ceasefire in Lebanon, and a pause on new U.S. sanctions.
“The deal is absolutely terrible, there’s no getting around it,” wrote Will Chamberlain on X.
The 14-point framework, shared on Wednesday, establishes an immediate ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. Provisions involve reopening the Strait of Hormuz, removing a U.S. naval blockade, temporary waivers for Iranian oil exports, and access to frozen Iranian assets. It also plans for a $300 billion economic reconstruction package and includes Iran’s promise not to pursue nuclear weapons.
Critics, however, argue the deal lacks requirements for Iran’s immediate nuclear infrastructure dismantlement, enriched uranium stockpile removal, or limits on Iran’s ballistic missile program. It does not address the disbandment of Iranian-backed groups like Hezbollah.
President Trump, attending a work meeting at the G7 summit, sees the agreement as progress, yet critics believe concessions made far outweigh commitments from Iran.
Mark Levin, a conservative talk show host, criticized the memorandum of understanding (MOU), stating that it removes leverage before significant concessions from Tehran. Others, like conservative commentator AG Hamilton, lambasted the MOU, noting it allows Iran to maintain key programs while receiving financial relief.
Miles Taylor, former Department of Homeland Security official, called the memorandum “pathetic” and criticized the exchange of significant funds for an assurance already held.
Atlanta-based talk radio host Erick Erickson described it as an “American surrender.” The MOU had been circulating for days, prompting reactions from commentators like David Reaboi, who expressed continued disapproval.
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene echoed criticism of the administration, questioning the rationality of proposed financial support for Iran, suggesting American taxpayers will bear the burden while the Iranian regime remains intact.
Former Vice President Mike Pence likened the ceasefire agreement to previous administrations’ strategies, which he viewed as appeasement of Iran. Similarly, Nikki Haley, a 2024 Republican candidate whom Trump defeated, dubbed the deal a “huge mistake,” criticizing its financial provisions.
“This regime chants death to America, murders our troops, and attempts to assassinate Americans on U.S. soil,” Haley wrote on X.
Conversely, some, including broadcaster Piers Morgan, welcomed the de-escalation. Morgan praised Trump’s move to withdraw from conflict but criticized the circumstances that led there.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for a comment. Elaine Mallon reports for Fox News Digital and Fox Business.