Commencement season has been challenging for speakers. Many have faced criticism for promoting artificial intelligence (AI) as a source of unlimited possibilities. These speeches have not resonated with graduates confronting a tough job market and heavy student debt.

In many industries, AI serves as a reason to slow down hiring at entry-level positions and cut jobs. Some tech executives warn of AI’s potential to eliminate jobs. This message has been met with disapproval at various colleges.

At the University of Central Florida, Gloria Caulfield described AI as “the next industrial revolution.” Similarly, Scott Borchetta at Middle Tennessee State University stated that “A.I. is rewriting production as we sit here.” Students responded with boos, upset by the optimistic portrayal of AI.

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, encountered loud protests at the University of Arizona. He reminded graduates that the future involved AI. Schmidt advised them to influence AI development, despite their worries about the impact on jobs, the climate, and politics.

Graduates feel frustration from being told by wealthy older adults that their future lies with AI, despite potential environmental impacts from data centers. Automation seems set to replace many jobs. Consequently, young people are understandably upset.

The M.I.T. Technology Review highlights a “looming crisis in entry-level work,” questioning the value of college in securing stable employment. Wealthy individuals have suggested that graduates could be substituted with bots. Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist, remarked on the reliability of AI bots compared to humans, noting they do not cause workplace issues or react to criticism.