Police in New Delhi used tear gas and batons to prevent supporters of India’s Cockroach movement from marching to Parliament on Monday. The protesters are demanding the resignation of the education minister. This marked a significant confrontation in the movement’s campaign against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. Despite the police action, many continued their march toward Parliament in smaller groups.

Protest and Police Response

Saurav Das, spokesperson for the Cockroach Janta Party, criticized the authorities for what he called a “brutal crackdown” on peaceful protesters. Delhi Police stated that the march was unauthorized and necessary restrictions were in place to maintain law and order during the monsoon session. The crowd gathered at Jantar Mantar, a location designated for protests near Parliament, included students, professionals, families, and children. As the day progressed, the gathering expanded beyond its initial site.

Many protesters carried backpacks with food and water, prepared for a lengthy day. Indian flags waved as chants against the education minister and Modi echoed through the crowd.

Origins of the Cockroach Movement

The Cockroach Janta Party began as a satirical movement in May after a Supreme Court chief justice’s remark comparing unemployed youth to “cockroaches.” This sarcastic reference became a rallying cry, gaining millions of followers on social media. The movement’s momentum increased following high-profile leaks of entrance exams for medical colleges and government jobs, which angered the public. Further attention came when police moved activist Sonam Wangchuk to a hospital during his hunger strike.

Protesters have camped at Jantar Mantar for a month, alongside student groups joining the hunger strike. Thousands have gathered in universities and rallies across various cities, demanding reforms and accountability for student suicides linked to paper leaks.

Government Reaction and Public Sentiment

Senior government leaders initially took a hard stance against the movement, with Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan accusing them of acting against the nation. However, outreach appeared as Health Minister J.P. Nadda met movement representatives. This meeting signaled a possible shift in approach. Das, who represented the protesters, presented demands for the education minister’s resignation.

Activist Wangchuk, meanwhile, sought permission to temporarily leave the hospital to join the march. He stated he would end his hunger strike if the government took responsibility or allowed protesters to reach Parliament.

Broader Implications for Modi’s Government

The protests present a rare public challenge to Modi’s government. They have received backing from opposition figures, activists, and celebrities. Many protesters, like yoga teacher Jyoti Rajput, argue the government fails to adequately address student issues. For others, the protests symbolize a broader demand for government transparency and accountability.

Protester Sneha Eppili highlighted her motivation by noting a sense of accountability owed by the government to the electors. She emphasized the need for government responsiveness as a fundamental human right.