The Lindsay Clancy murder case, featuring the deaths of her three young children, has captured widespread attention following a mistrial. Legal experts are now discussing the possibility of resolving the case through a plea deal instead of a second trial.

On the ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ show, criminal defense attorney Donna Rotunno weighed in on the case. The discussion centered around whether a second trial is likely, or if a plea bargain could resolve the charges.

Judge Judy Sheindlin also expressed her views on the case. Speaking to TMZ, she warned of the potential ‘danger’ if prosecutors decide not to retry Clancy, after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict. Sheindlin considered the outcome of the trial, where jurors were reportedly split 11-1 in favor of not finding Clancy criminally responsible.

“I think there’s a danger in not retrying,” Sheindlin stated.

Sheindlin, known for her long-running show ‘Judge Judy,’ questioned whether Clancy should have been found guilty, emphasizing the need for an excuse for her actions.

Kevin Reddington, Clancy’s defense attorney, stated during the trial that Clancy was not criminally responsible due to mental illness or defect, explaining why the defense did not dispute the fact that Clancy strangled her children.

In response to Rep. Nancy Mace’s public call for Clancy to be executed, Sheindlin dismissed the idea, calling it “ridiculous.”

The defense argued circumstances surrounding the mistrial should prevent a second trial. Reddington expressed willingness for a bench trial if charges are reduced to second-degree murder, hoping for probation.

Clancy remains in custody at Tewksbury Hospital, with her next court appearance set for September 29.