A forensic test conducted on a hair sample found at the Tucson, Arizona residence of Nancy Guthrie, missing mother of ‘Today’ show co-host Savannah Guthrie, revealed no significant results. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos shared this information with CBS News, stating that the sample failed to identify a suspect.
“The sample results were inconclusive,” Sheriff Nanos reported. The verification of these findings occurred in early June, but Thursday marked the first public disclosure of this information. Nanos also mentioned ongoing analysis of blood and other DNA collected at the scene, which has not produced leads either. “Blood was found there and is part of our ongoing investigation,” he said.
Earlier reports from May revealed a DNA sample had been sent by local detectives to a private lab in Florida, then forwarded to the FBI in Quantico, Virginia. Officials, however, have not confirmed whether this was the same hair sample discussed now.
“We’re collaborating with experienced DNA scientists nationwide,” Nanos assured. Nancy Guthrie, 84, was last seen on January 31 after being dropped off from a visit to her daughter Annie. Security footage from her home captured an unidentified suspect at her door early on February 1. Investigators suspect abduction and confirmed receipt of at least two ransom notes following her disappearance.
“Even cold cases remain active. We persist in our efforts; this case is far from dormant,” emphasized Nanos. “No matter how long it takes, we are committed.” Despite earlier released surveillance footage, new videos have not surfaced, and suspects seemed to avoid traffic cameras.
Addressing the suspect’s potential proximity, Nanos remarked, “I strongly suspect that they are local, although hard evidence is absent. Nationally, a large majority of crimes are committed by local individuals.”
On Monday, Savannah Guthrie addressed her mother’s alleged captors on social media, pleading, “I’m begging you to make the right decision. Guide us to her. It’s never too late for the right choice.”
Amid criticism from FBI Director Kash Patel, alleging a slow response from the sheriff’s office, Nanos stated, “I haven’t communicated with Patel personally, yet our respective teams collaborate effectively. That’s what matters.”
Optimistic about solving the case, Nanos concluded, “We have critical evidence that remains confidential, which forms the foundation of our investigation strategies.”
Contributions to this report were made by Anna Schecter.