August 6, 2026

Judge Rules Ballot Language on Florida’s Amendment 3 Misleading

James Uthmeier speaks at the National Conservatism Conference in Washington D.C., Sept. 3, 2025. (Photo by Dominic Gwinn / Middle East Images via AFP) (Photo by DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

James Uthmeier spoke at the National Conservatism Conference in Washington D.C. on September 3, 2025. A decision by a Tallahassee judge highlighted significant issues with the ballot language for Amendment 3. This proposed amendment aims to cut property taxes in Florida. However, the language has been labeled biased and in need of revision for voters to make an informed choice.

The amendment language was found defective by Leon County Circuit Judge David Frank. He stated in an 18-page ruling that the wording was more of a political statement than an unbiased explanation. The title, “Save Our Homes From Excessive Property Taxes,” was criticized for its lack of neutrality.

“Voters are entitled to a fair, clear, accurate, and non-misleading ballot statement to assist them in making their critical determination. The present ballot language would deprive the voters of the opportunity to make a meaningful decision,” Judge Frank wrote.

The amendment is controversial, initially promoted by Governor Ron DeSantis. It proposes increasing the homestead exemption to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028. Another aspect would reduce the cap on assessment increases for non-homestead properties from 10% to 5%. The Legislature modified the bill to ensure property tax funding for public schools remains unaffected, which led to DeSantis expressing dissatisfaction with the changes.

A bipartisan group named Save Our Voters From Misleading Ballot Language legally challenged the amendment. This group includes figures like former Senator Jeff Brandes and former U.S. Representative Al Lawson. Attorney General James Uthmeier, appointed by DeSantis and running for election, has a 10-day deadline to revise the language. Any further legal challenges must occur within the subsequent 10 days.

The judge pointed out various issues, including misleading subheadings. He noted that the amendment might decrease revenue for local services like police and fire. The summary also incorrectly promises fairness, ignoring potential negative impacts on renters and recent residents of Florida. A significant omission is how the amendment could alter local government control over property tax revenue.

Voters will make the final decision in November if the proposal appears on the ballot with improved language. A clearer proposal would increase voters’ understanding of its potential effects.

About the Editorial Board

The Miami Herald Editorial Board, separate from the newsroom, represents various opinions. Members include opinion editor Amy Driscoll and writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. The board focuses on issues affecting South Florida, promoting social justice and fairness.

The difference between Op-Eds and columns lies in their authorship. Op-Eds are from external contributors, while columns are regular pieces from staff writers.

To contribute to the Miami Herald’s opinion section, community members can submit Op-Eds or letters with their viewpoints on relevant issues.

TAGS: