On August 9, California Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom declared himself “an established insurgent.” This reflects his attempt to appeal to radical elements while maintaining ties to the political establishment. Newsom’s approach appears contradictory, as he tries to embody both revolutionary and establishment personas.
The influence of radicals is growing in the U.S., and Newsom seeks to align with them. He aims to avoid the fate of his adversaries by leveraging class division. This strategy is reminiscent of historical figures from the French Revolution, notably Georges Jacques Danton.
Danton’s story is detailed in “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.” Despite not being from the working class, educated individuals like lawyers and journalists initiated what became known as “The Terror.” Danton, a lawyer, cultivated revolution but eventually fell victim to it.
Danton gained power by inciting class warfare and became a key figure in the Jacobin movement, which led to mass executions. His rhetoric labeled others as threats to the nation, justifying extreme measures.
Despite securing power initially, the movement turned inward. Danton’s understanding of endless violence led him to question the continued executions. He ultimately faced execution himself on April 5, 1794.
Today, radicals also call for purging moderates from the Democratic Party. Newsom, however, remains hopeful that he can harness this dynamic for personal political gain, ignoring Danton’s cautionary words: “Woe betide those who would provoke revolutions.”
Newsom aspires to be among the influential figures in a reshaped Democratic Party. By advocating radical changes, he seeks favor from socialists while hoping his own affluence remains unnoticed. Similarly, Rep. Ro Khanna attempts to secure the socialist vote despite notable wealth.
Newsom’s appeal to the masses often appears less genuine, with his political strategies failing to gain significant traction. His standing in polls, such as trailing former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, reflects this challenge. Buttigieg’s own promises of change have more appeal, demonstrated by his associations with figures like Abdul El-Sayed.
The loss of candidates like Francesca Hong does not deter Newsom, who observes close results in races such as the Wisconsin gubernatorial nomination. However, victories by radicals in other states, including Minnesota, suggest socialists’ increasing influence.
Newsom seeks to lead a segment of the Democratic Party he perceives as open to his leadership. Yet, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s popularity marks strong competition. Voters discern authentic advocacy over mixed messages.
As Kamala Harris and Buttigieg court the radical fringe, Newsom needs stronger endorsements to remain relevant. Suggestions, such as Supreme Court expansion, have become baseline, with radicals demanding more, including potentially scrapping the Constitution.
Newsom desires a prominent role in the Democratic hierarchy. He pushes for systemic changes hoping to sidestep scrutiny of his privileges. His status as an “established insurgent” suggests he seeks leadership rather than falling victim to shifting political dynamics.
Historically, leaders like Danton faced dire outcomes as revolutionary fervor evolved. Newsom’s endeavors might struggle to sustain long-term support amidst far-left momentum. Despite his modern appeal, history might yet repeat in unexpected ways.
Jonathan Turley, a Fox News Media contributor, discusses these dynamics along with historical parallels in his recent book “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.” His legal expertise includes significant cases and contributions to public discourse on constitutional law.