July 18, 2026

Federal Court Overturns New Jersey’s Ban on Semiautomatic Rifles

A federal appeals court has overturned New Jersey’s ban on semiautomatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. This development is considered a significant win by the National Rifle Association (NRA), which has been involved in legal proceedings regarding this issue since 2018.

Court Ruling

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia made the decision. The court stated that New Jersey’s restrictions violated the Second Amendment. An earlier lower court ruling was expanded upon by declaring the ban on semiautomatic rifles, not limited to the AR-15, and the magazine restrictions as unconstitutional.

Judge Arianna Freeman, appointed by President Biden, wrote the majority opinion. The decision cited the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment rulings, requiring state firearm regulations to align with America’s historical tradition. The court found New Jersey did not meet this requirement.

Reaction from the NRA

The NRA expressed its satisfaction, calling the ruling a historic victory for the Second Amendment and gun owners across the nation. Justin Davis, managing director of public affairs for the NRA, emphasized the importance of this decision for law-abiding citizens.

“This ruling protects the rights of millions of responsible gun owners in the Garden State,” stated from the NRA.

The NRA considers the decision a benchmark for their ongoing efforts to dismantle similar gun control laws nationwide.

Historical Context and Dissent

New Jersey’s ban was enacted in 1990 following a school shooting in California. The state’s governor at the time referred to these firearms as capable of “wholesale destruction.” Despite this, the court has now ruled that such rifles and magazines are protected by the Second Amendment.

Some judges disagreed with the ruling, arguing that the banned firearms are dangerous and that states should have the authority to regulate them. They noted that other federal courts have upheld similar state restrictions.

The case highlights ongoing legal debates over firearm regulations in the U.S.

TAGS: