On Thursday morning, demonstrators gathered in Washington, D.C., to oppose a proposed arch by former President Trump. The structure was planned to be erected at Memorial Circle, connecting the National Mall to Arlington National Cemetery. The protest occurred during rush hour, drawing a diverse group of veterans, retirees, and lawmakers.
The protesters voiced concerns about the arch’s size, cost, and lack of Congressional approval. They criticized its potential impact on the surrounding area and Arlington National Cemetery. Speakers stood next to a tarp mockup, stating the real arch would be 32 times taller.
It’s the wrong monument, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, dedicated to the wrong man,said Jon Gundersen, a retired Army veteran.
Gundersen, a Vietnam War veteran, traveled from South Carolina and expressed gratitude for the widespread support. He argued the proposed monument failed to honor veterans appropriately.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., criticized the project’s lack of involvement from veterans and gold star families. She condemned the effort by recalling her own future burial plans at Arlington Cemetery.
The White House defended the arch as a potential enhancement to the visitor experience, commemorating American heroes. However, Duckworth and others suggested that the funds would be better spent on veteran services rather than a triumphal arch.
Demonstrators expressed concerns over the arch’s proximity to Arlington National Cemetery, noting how it might overshadow funerals. Cycling and commuting bystanders showed support for the protestors, while planes frequently flew overhead.
Several activists pointed out potential aviation safety risks with the arch’s inclusion of military drones and snipers. Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., questioned the necessity for such measures in a public space.
The Trump administration and federal agencies did not respond to NPR’s inquiries about the arch’s military aspects. Despite legal challenges, the proposal is moving swiftly through the federal approval process.
Challenges Facing the Arch’s Approval
The arch’s construction faces an upcoming review by the National Capital Planning Commission. The National Park Service had engaged with stakeholders to mitigate potential harm to nearby historic landmarks. However, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation prematurely terminated this review process, causing concern among preservationists.
Charles Birnbaum of The Cultural Landscape Foundation criticized the council for cutting the review short. The council will now provide recommendations directly to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum.
In Congress, a bipartisan permitting reform bill threatens to weaken protections for historic sites. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., previously attempted to block federal funding for the arch without success.
Protests continued, with demonstrators promising to resist the construction if it proceeds. Julius D. “JD” Spain Sr., from Arlington County’s Board, urged citizens to contact lawmakers and oppose the arch.
Rep. Beyer highlighted the readiness of activists to protest against the arch’s construction. Congressional action to block federal funding remains a possibility, though partisan divides prevent immediate action.
Upcoming midterm elections could influence Congressional control, potentially impacting the arch’s future.