Former US men’s team defender Jonathan Bornstein discusses FIFA’s controversial decision involving Folarin Balogun. Balogun’s red card suspension was reversed, allowing him to play in a crucial World Cup Round of 16 match against Belgium. Bornstein argues the decision was proper, contrasting with criticism from the Norway coach.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has been praised for its success both on and off the field. Visitors enjoyed experiencing the United States’ hospitality, and host venues received positive feedback for their amenities and atmosphere. However, controversy has not been absent, particularly with Balogun’s red card in a match against Bosnia and Herzegovina. This card was shown due to a misapplication of VAR rules, leading FIFA to delay his suspension. This move sparked criticism from European fans, commentators, and their soccer federation.

Simultaneously, allegations arose from the Egyptian team following their 3-2 loss to Argentina. Egyptian coach Hossam Hassan criticized the officiating, stating that respect and fair play were absent. He pointed to incidents involving potential penalty checks and disallowed goals, suggesting an unfair influence favoring Argentina. Hassan expressed suspicion that external factors sought to keep the reigning champions and Lionel Messi in the competition.

Mostafa Ziko, an Egyptian forward, echoed this sentiment, alleging bias in the refereeing. He noted that Egypt appeared to be winning 2-0 before key decisions changed the game’s outcome. He claimed that these decisions worked against his team and implied rigging in favor of Argentina.

FIFA is likely pleased about Argentina and Messi advancing. As one of the sport’s biggest stars, Messi enhances viewership and interest in the tournament. However, the controversial calls, especially the disallowed second goal, sparked debate. While some decisions may have been borderline, others seemed misplaced, raising questions about the officiating process.