In January 2024, Justice Arthur Engoron faced a bomb threat at his residence. Early one morning, while walking his dog, police lights surrounded his home. Officers informed him of the threat and asked if there were others inside. Engoron confirmed his wife and children were there. In response, the family left their home in the cold.
Later that day, Engoron returned to his courtroom to preside over a significant trial involving former President Donald Trump. The civil fraud trial was marked by intense exchanges, frequent objections, and campaign-related actions. Despite Engoron’s instructions, Trump presented his own closing argument.
In a recent interview with CBS News, Engoron discussed his experiences during and after the trial. He noted a concerning trend of public hostility towards judges, linking it to increased security needs and the U.S. Marshals Service’s call for enhanced federal judicial protection. Engoron observed that the rising threat level might deter some individuals from pursuing judicial positions. However, he expressed that those who might shy away may not be suited for the role.
“I think that there will be some people that will be less inclined to become judges because the threat level has apparently increased.” – Arthur Engoron
Throughout the trial, Engoron received numerous threats, including antisemitic and homophobic comments, and an envelope with white powder. Harassment continued even during his personal activities, such as a verbal attack at his gym.
The trial’s high-profile nature seemed to provoke Trump and his supporters, who labeled Engoron with various derogatory terms. However, Engoron drew a firm boundary when confrontations targeted his staff. A gag order was imposed on Trump forbidding attacks on Engoron’s law clerk, who required an escort to and from her home.
Post-retirement, Engoron is now with Phillips Nizer LLP but misses his judicial role. He fondly recalls how people recognized him and expressed their gratitude for his work. Instances included encounters with strangers and even recognition from Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
“Being a judge is just the greatest job in the world. You get to help society. You get to set precedents. You get all this respect.” – Arthur Engoron
Amidst the trial’s commotion, Engoron faced accusations from Trump’s allies, including Rep. Elise Stefanik. Critics claimed he sought media attention and criticized his instructions to reporters, such as the pronunciation of his name.
Engoron allowed both sides significant freedom during court proceedings, rarely interrupting lengthy arguments from Trump’s team. He believed in letting everyone speak to avoid grounds for appeal based on not considering all evidence.
His rulings and written opinions were noted for their directness. Accusations of fraud were strong, leading to liability findings against Trump and his company before the trial’s end. Although financial penalties were overturned on appeal, the finding of fraud remained.
Despite appeals, Engoron is content with his judicial decisions, maintaining he aimed for balanced rulings throughout the trial. “I had my moments of glory. I tried to do the right thing,” Engoron reflects. His tenure left a significant impact during a unique moment in judicial history.